Public Financing Scheme Unconstitutional

Yankee Institute’s Policy Director Welcomes the District Court Ruling

HARTFORD – District Court Judge Stefan R. Underhill ruled today that the Citizens’ Election Program (CEP), Connecticut’s Public Financing Scheme for political candidates, is unconstitutional. Yankee Institute Policy Director Heath W. Fahle offered his reaction:

“The ruling today is a great victory for people disenfranchised by the system,” said Fahle. “The Citizens’ Election Program unfairly discriminated against minor party and petitioning candidates and gave an unfair advantage to Republicans and Democrats.”

Judge Underhill’s ruling featured four major points:

CEP granted funds beyond historic campaign expenditure levels

According to an upcoming study by the Yankee Institute, in 2008, CEP grants represented a decrease in the amount of money spent by a campaign in only 14 of 70 cases (20%).

CEP strengthens major party candidates that otherwise would not have the public support or success to run for office

While the number of major party candidates has held steady over the last several election cycles, the number of minor party candidates running for State Senate in 2008 dropped to a ten year low – just five candidates.

CEP regulations for a qualifying minor party candidate are impossible
CEP distribution formula discourages minor party candidates

In order for a petitioning candidate or minor party candidate to qualify for a full grant under the Citizens’ Election Program, State Senate candidates had meet the program qualification thresholds (raise $15,000 in $100 increments from 300 in-district donors) and acquire signatures equal to 20% of the total votes cast for that office in the previous election. Consider that for statewide candidates, they are required by the state to collect 7500 signatures to get on the statewide ballot. For State Senate races, 7500 signatures would not be enough to qualify for the full CEP grant in 47% of the districts.

“This ruling is a victory for those who want to participate in the political process but are left out because of who they choose to associate with,” concluded Fahle. “The principle of limited government has prevailed once again.”
###

New Poll: Voters Say Cut Spending

Download the results from the Yankee Institute Poll now!

NEW POLL: CONNECTICUT VOTERS SAY CUT SPENDING

HARTFORD – A brushfire poll conducted by the Yankee Institute shows that Connecticut voters overwhelming favor cutting state spending over raising taxes, and are unenthusiastic about Governor Rell’s tax increase proposals.

• By 72-28 percent, voters say the state should cut spending rather than raise taxes to plug the $8 billion budget deficit.

• By 66-34 percent, voters say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who voted to raise the income tax.

• By 54-46 percent, voters say Gov. Rell’s support for higher taxes makes them less likely to vote for her.

• 45 percent of voters say they have considered moving out of Connecticut due to the state’s high taxes.

Voters were unenthusiastic about Governor Rell’s proposed package of tax increases and tax cuts, and expressed mixed feelings:

• By 59-41 percent, voters support Gov. Rell’s proposal to cut the state sales tax from 6 to 5.5 percent.

• By 54-46 percent, voters support Gov. Rell’s proposal to eliminate the inheritance tax.

• By 53-47 percent, residents oppose Gov. Rell’s proposed 10 percent increase in the corporate tax.

• By 56-44 percent, voters support Gov. Rell’s proposal to increase income taxes on the wealthy.

• By 72-28 percent, voters support Gov. Rell’s proposal to increase the cigarette tax.

The poll of 471 Connecticut registered voters was conducted on Thursday night. It has a margin of error of 4.5 percent. Top line results, including wording of the questions, is posted here.

How Your Money is Being Spent

By Fergus Cullen – This article was originally published on Sunday, August 23, 2009, by the New Haven Register.

U.S. Rep. Christopher S. Murphy, D-5, sent more mail at taxpayer expense than any other member of Congress from New England in the past two years. U.S. Rep. Joseph D. Courtney, D-2, is Connecticut’s least frugal member, according to a new analysis of congressional office spending done by the Yankee Institute.

How members of Congress spend their personal office budgets has long been shrouded in mystery. Disclosure reports have only been available in paperback volumes containing more than 1,000 pages of tiny print, and these tomes are only available in a small basement office at the Capitol or in select Federal Depository libraries. It’s enough to make one think Congress doesn’t want the public to see how members spend our money.

The Yankee Institute is bringing sunlight, transparency and disclosure to how Connecticut’s members of Congress spend their personal office budgets. Every line item of office spending for Connecticut’s five members of the House of Representatives for the 110th session of Congress from 2007 through 2008) — some 10,000 line items covering nearly $13 million in spending — is now published and downloadable at yankeeinstitute.org.

Courtney spent 99.3 and 99.7 percent of his office budget during his first two years in Congress, last year spending all but $4,432 of his $1.3 million budget. Former U.S. Rep. Christopher Shays, R-4, defeated for re-election last year, was the second-highest spending member as a result of maintaining the biggest payroll in the delegation. At 90.4 percent, Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro, D-3, spent the lowest percentage of her office budget.

These budgets are “use it or lose it;” that is, any money not spent at the end of the year stays in the U.S. Treasury. Members who are frugal — say, by getting by with smaller staffs or by sending less mail at taxpayer expense — directly save taxpayers money.

Members of Congress enjoy something called the franking privilege, by which they can send unlimited amounts of mail at taxpayer expense using their signature in lieu of standard postage.

Murphy sent 1.3 million pieces of mass mail using the franking privilege, more mail than any of New England’s 22 members of Congress. These glossy, full-color pieces are often indistinguishable from campaign mailings, but are sent at taxpayer expense. The mailings are banned within 90 days of an election, an acknowledgement of the political benefit of sending such mailings.

Courtney’s total of 941,355 pieces of mass mail ranked him second in Connecticut and third in New England. For comparison, U.S. Rep. John B. Larson, D-1, and Shays both sent fewer than 10,000 such pieces, and three members of Congress from Massachusetts sent none.

The reports reveal that six staffers working for Connecticut members earned more than $100,000 each last year, topped by Courtney’s chief of staff, Jason Gross, who took home $151,411 in 2008.

In addition to base pay, many staffers appear to have been given generous end-of-year bonuses. DeLauro appears to have awarded $7,000 bonuses to 13 of her staffers at the end of 2008, based on the difference in their pay between the third and fourth quarters of the year, followed by a decline in pay for the first quarter of 2009. The same pattern is evident in 2007, when most of DeLauro’s staffers received a $6,000 spike in fourth quarter pay.

Courtney and Murphy also appear to have given generous bonuses after their successful re-elections last fall. These bonuses came at exactly the time when hundreds of thousands of their Connecticut constituents were worried about keeping their own jobs and were foregoing bonuses themselves. And, because of the “use or lose it” nature of Congressional office budgets, a member’s decision to award the end-of-year bonuses meant not leaving that money in the Treasury.

Larson and DeLauro combined to spend $15,100 for calendars for their constituents. Larson spent more on bottled water, $6,346.60, than any other member of Connecticut’s delegation, and also spent $4,527 on food and beverages at the Hartford Marriott over two days in February, 2007. Murphy spent at least $84.35 on Diet Mountain Dew, a soft drink.

After stonewalling for years, Congress has finally announced plans to make office spending reports publicly available over the Internet by the end of this year, starting with spending reports covering the third quarter of 2009 — conveniently, after giving notice to members that future spending reports might get more attention than they have in the past. Congress has no plans to make the reports detailed in the Yankee Institute’s study available online.

Fergus Cullen is executive director of the Yankee Institute, P.O. Box 260660, Hartford 06126. E-mail: fergus@yankeeinstitute.org.

Congressional Spending Report Stirs Pot

 
The Yankee Institute’s new study “The Care and Feeding of Connecticut’s Congressmen” has taxpayers grumbling all across Connecticut today as they learn about how their Member of Congress spends their hard-earned tax dollars.

Among the Yankee Institute’s findings:

  • Courtney was “the highest-spending member of Connecticut’s delegation” — based on his spending of 99.3 percent and 99.7 percent of his annual budget allotments in 2007 and 2008. House members get an annual office allotment of $1.3 million to $1.4 million, and must “use it or lose it.” U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-3rd District, spent the least of her allotment during those two years, with spending figures of 89.5 percent and 91.3 percent, the report said.
  • Courtney’s chief of staff, Jason Gross, was paid $151,411 in 2008, “making him the highest-paid staffer in the House delegation.” Gross’ salary narrowly outranked those of Democratic 5th District U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy’s staff chief, Joshua Raymond, at $149,544; and former Republican 4th District U.S. Rep. Chris Shays’ staff chief, Elizabeth Hawkings, at $148,366, the report said. Shays lost the 2008 election and was replaced in January by Democrat Jim Himes, who is not covered by the report.

The Yankee Institute’s critics have lashed out at the report. The Hartford Courant ran an article today featuring many of their grumbles, as well as a blog post on their Capitol Watch blog.

Download the Full Report (PDF)

Download the data now! XLSXLS PDFPDF

The Care and Feeding of Our Congressmen

CareandFeeding
TRANSPARENCY FOR THE FIRST TIME

Published on August 8, 2009 by the Yankee Institute for Public Policy

Download the data now! XLSXLS PDFPDF

How much responsibility does any single member of Congress have for the $3 trillion Federal budget? It’s impossible to say. Like a football team, so many people contribute to the success or failure of each play that one is never able to assign sole responsibility for any outcome to the actions of any one player.

But there is one area of spending that is completely under the control of a single member of Congress: his or her own office budget.  Members are allocated more than $1.3 million each year to spend at their own discretion.  This money covers items including staff salaries, transportation to and from Washington, rent, office supplies, and communicating with constituents. Any money not spent at the end of the year stays in the Treasury.  That is, a frugal member of Congress directly saves taxpayers money.

For the first time anywhere online, the Yankee Institute is bringing sunlight, transparency, and disclosure to how Connecticut’s members of Congress spend their personal office budgets. Every line item of office spending for Connecticut’s five members of the House of Representatives for the 110th session of Congress (2007-08) – some 10,000 line items covering nearly $13 million in spending – is now published and downloadable here.

Download the data now!   XLSXLS  PDFPDF

 For years, Congress made it nearly impossible for the public to see how individual members spend their personal office budgets. The Chief Administrative Officer of the House publishes a quarterly report called “Statement of Disbursements of the House,” but these reports are not available online. They are only available in paperback, each volume comprised of more than 1,000 pages of tiny print. These tomes are only available in a small basement office at the Capitol or in select Federal Depository libraries. Even then, the reports lag months behind.

It’s enough to make one think Congress doesn’t want the public to see how members spend our money. The recent scandal involving British Members of Parliament grew out of a similar lack of transparency.

Yankee’s review of the reports includes these key findings:

• Congressman Joe Courtney was the highest-spending member of Connecticut’s delegation. Courtney spent 99.3 and 99.7 percent of his annual budget in the past two years. In 2008, Courtney left just $4,432 of his budget unspent.
• Congressman Chris Murphy sent the most franked mail – 1.3 million pieces – of New England’s 22 members of Congress.
• Six Connecticut staff members were paid more than $100,000 in 2008.
• Rep. Courtney’s Chief of Staff, Jason Gross, was paid $151,411 in 2008, making him the highest-paid staffer in the House delegation.

Download the Full Report (PDF)

Download the data now! XLSXLS PDFPDF